It would seem that in the 4 years of its existence the EN C two-liner segment has taken its final shape, once and for all. A typical two-liner "C" is a massive, bulky racing machine that needs careful packing into the backpack, with somewhat labored maneuverability and sparingly measured feedback. Rare exceptions like the Swing Libra RS or the Zoom X2C LT only confirm the established status quo. So the question is, how are pilots supposed to live with this if they want both to fight for the podium and simply enjoy flying, rather than all that?.. Until recently there was no answer. Either you enjoy flying, or you put on fashionable lycra, climb into a submarina and start playing a Real Athlete, who in the fight for an illusory podium has to put up with all sorts of -- far from illusory! -- discomforts. Fortunately, a third force unexpectedly stepped into this balance. And its name is the Niviuk Artik R2.
Construction
Risers
A standard, solid Niviuk of the 2025 vintage, with no miracles or breakthroughs, but not without a spark of genius either. I'll compare them with the risers of the ParAAvis Ray 2, which happened to be at hand, as if by accident. The webbing, the stitching, even the pulleys -- it would seem everything is more or less the same as on the ParAAvis. But the devil is in the details. As is traditional for Niviuk, the left riser is marked with red webbing and the right one with green: you can't mix them up, even when the wing is packed in its concertina bag. The kinematics are somewhat non-obvious, and there is a limiter, hinting at the sporty purpose of our test subject. All connections are on metal connectors, again traditionally for Niviuk secured with inserts of moulded plastic: simple, reliable, convenient. There is metal in the speed system too, in the form of Brummel hooks: a hint that this wing is not from the lightweight P series. Then again, if the "brummels" annoy you, they are easy to remove. The rear riser handles are of the complex design and shape traditional for Niviuk, made of two kinds of moulded plastic. They feel very nice in the hands (some of the nicest I have ever tried), but on tricky launches the lines can catch on such handles. The brake leader line is unexpectedly wide and runs through a pulley instead of a ceramic ring (which on Niviuks quite often turned out to be chipped), but it can still be replaced by the owner. The magnets are specific: the brake handles have to be pulled off strictly downwards, which I don't really like. And finally, the brake handles. Niviuk unexpectedly decided to play Ozone! The handles are of an almost Ozone design -- with a semi-rigid finger pad at the top. At the bottom there is, for some reason, a rigid insert, not very comfortable and (unlike the one in Swing's brake handles) not removable without unpicking the handles. A bit overthought, in short. But overall the risers are quite good.
Lines
Well, it seems like a classic. Everything is neat, unsheathed, and even with a cheerful anti-UV coating. But the main drawback of this Artik, in my opinion, is unexpectedly hiding precisely in the lines. The outer bottom lines of the front and rear rows are very thin and slippery, and these are exactly the lines you have to pull to fold ordinary "ears" or to do Niviuk's signature B-ears (two local stalls at the wingtips). And the load on these lines is far from small too. In gloves with very grippy palms I somehow managed; with more slippery gloves you most likely won't hold these lines, and there is a fair chance of sawing through your gloves with them. Half-meter inserts of a thicker and rougher line wouldn't hurt at all!
Canopy
Build quality
Surface smoothness
A couple of words about the concertina bag that today's Niviuks come with. It looks like Niviuk puts so much effort into developing its wonderful wings that often there is no creativity left for decent concertina bags. From the outside it is a nice, neatly made "brick" with a zip all around. But if you open that zip, you find that the concertina is held together by a few narrow fastex buckles, while the strap at the front of the concertina for some reason has no buckle at all. Stuffing the springy nitinol of the leading edge under this stubborn strap in a winter wind is quite a pleasure. Wrapping the concertina around the harness is even less pleasant -- in fact it stays unfastened, and the lines falling out of it tend to end up anywhere but in the backpack. A small thing, but annoying. A concertina with a long zip and a flap, like those from Gin or Advance, would be more appropriate here. Then again, if you go along with Niviuk and zip the concertina into a brick every time, the problem with the lines goes away.
OK, enough of the sad stuff. Better about the good stuff -- the wing itself. The weight of the wing including the concertina bag: 4.9 kg! And this is a wing the manufacturer positions as a racer, with no hints at the fashionable semi-light and hike-and-fly. Some more-or-less lightweight wings weigh more! This is mainly the "fault" of nitinol, which saves a few hundred grams compared to plastic rods. The fabric used here is ordinary, not lightweight. Even more interesting, the modest weight did not affect the complexity of the construction in any way: an AR of 6.5, 68 cells, complex internal "stuffing", a perfectly smooth leading edge... Hello, Niviuk, how do you do that? ;)
The shape of the Artik R2 instantly gives it away as a Niviuk of the 2025 pedigree. With the shape of its wingtips and its twist it refers to the Artik 7P, the Klimber 3P and several simpler wings from the same manufacturer. Another recognizable detail is the characteristic 3D shaping at the trailing edge. Overall this shape feels calm and harmonious. Running ahead, I'll note that this impression matches the character of our test subject quite well ;) The distribution of rigid elements in the wing turned out to be very interesting. Yes, there is quite a lot of nitinol here... but it is very different nitinol. First, wire of at least two different diameters is used. Second, the bottom surface of the wing is reinforced with nitinol far from everywhere, and not necessarily along the whole chord. Not all load-bearing ribs are reinforced with nitinol, and there is clearly less nitinol in the center section than in the "ears"! Obviously, such clever design solutions couldn't fail to affect the character of the wing... but more on that below.
Takeoff and groundhandling
Groundhandling
I didn't groundhandle it much, but the impressions are most positive. A very interesting combination of a smooth rise overhead and no tendency to "shoot", together with no tendency to hang back either. The Artik R2 doesn't fly up overhead, and doesn't crawl up like some heavy two-liners, but really walks up -- calmly, confidently, slightly leisurely. A very pleasant feeling! You can play with the wing on the ground any way you like -- it forgives a lot and obeys the pilot perfectly. Probably one of the nicest two-liners in this respect.
Takeoff
It doesn't seem to be a hike-and-fly wing, but such a launch would do credit even to wings specially "tuned" for difficult launches in difficult places. The ability of this Artik to come up overhead calmly and smoothly, yet confidently, helped a lot on launches from icy slopes in strong gusty wind. Out of curiosity, I once deliberately left the wing hanging back -- but the Artik R2, after hesitating for a couple of seconds for show, decided to ignore the silly pilot after all and corrected my mistake by itself. Behavior that is rare for a two-liner with sporting ambitions!
Flight

Glide
I'll put it cautiously: competitive in its class. In winter there was hardly anyone to compare with, and instrumental glide measurements are still science fiction for now. Subjectively, though, the Artik R2 didn't disappoint. And this glider certainly won't disappoint those who take it not for desperate attempts to climb onto a competition podium, but simply for pleasure. It flies well, convincingly ;)
Accelerated flight
Speed gain
Speed system effort
Speed system travel
Sorry, but I can't give any numbers, I have a problem with measurements at the moment. But indirect signs show that in the fast part of its polar the Artik R2 should at least outperform its predecessor. At most -- I expect this Artik to be competitive at competitions. The fully pushed speed bar literally "drops" the wing a few meters down -- behavior typical of the Niviuk X-One, and of very fast wings in general. Other subjective impressions also point to a high top speed. The L/D at these speeds didn't disappoint either: the glider doesn't tend to "sink like a stone". At the same time, this Artik is fine in terms of comfort at top speed: it behaves calmer than at speeds close to trim. The speed system travel and effort are well chosen and comfortable.
Soaring and sink rate
Sink rate in straight flight
Sink rate in spiral
Convincing! One more argument that our test subject has a good L/D across the whole polar, including its slow part. Despite being loaded near the top of the weight range, the Artik R2 did very well while soaring in light winter thermals, and it's not only about the sink rate, which is pleasantly low, but also about its signature maneuverability, more on which below.
Turn ability
Brakes efficiency
Weight shift efficiency
Rear risers control
In short -- the big brother of the other Artik, the 7P! Very similar, but a bit more "grown-up", more solid, without excess sharpness, yet very precise and clear for the pilot. And probably sharper than typical racing two-liners, which traditionally don't shine in maneuverability. No, our hero's maneuverability isn't record-breaking either, but there is noticeably more of it than in one-hundred-percent racing wings. And that is very pleasant! In thermals the Artik R2 clearly "follows the hand" and holds the spiral set by the pilot perfectly. This wasn't noticed in the previous generation of Niviuks, and yet such behavior is not only pleasant, but also lets you work the thermals more efficiently.
Steering and control with the rear risers. And again you feel a close kinship with the third Klimber! The load on the rear risers is very pleasant -- neither too much, nor too little. The wing's reactions to the risers are about the same -- without excess sharpness, but quick and precise. The efficiency of the risers is somewhat above average, which is also pleasant.
Comfort and feedback
Comfort
Feedback
Having set course for comfort back in the days of the Peak 6, Niviuk decided not to stop! All the more so as such renowned products as the Ozone Photon and the Gin GTO3 are breathing down the neck of today's hero -- both very calm and without much feedback. But, luckily for the brand's fans, the Artik R2 didn't turn out to be yet another so-so handling, not very communicative tool for flying at high speeds through any rough stuff. That is, it can do this too, but not at the cost of losing feedback. With great pleasure I'll repeat the phrase I like to use for the Niviuks of the mid-2020s: Niviuk is the new Advance! Yes, that's it. Almost Advance-like transparency and clarity of reactions to restless air. No excess sharpness, no complex transitions -- only information in a pure form, not spoiled by random distortions! And there is quite a lot of this information by EN C standards, especially compared to the racing two-liners already mentioned above. But this feedback doesn't turn into discomfort -- first, because the Artik R2 passes to the pilot exactly what it should, and second, because all the movements of the wing are very pleasantly and springily damped. It reminded me of some wings from UP -- they also tend to softly damp the excess, delivering clearly dosed and pleasantly served information to the pilot. The two-liner magic of the Artik R2 is simple and straightforward: it always gets pulled into the lift -- both at its periphery and at the entry into the core -- and this is very convenient and intuitive for the pilot. I cored my first proper thermal on the Artik R2 straight away, so to speak, without thinking at all about what I was doing and how -- everything was clear from the very first seconds!
Dynamics and energy retention
Dynamics
Energy retention
Classic of the classics! This is exactly how, in my understanding, an EN C two-liner should behave. Smooth energy buildup, smooth release of it, everything happens simply, clearly, predictably and under the pilot's control. One of the best ways to "feel out" a wing's dynamics is wingovers, and the Artik R2 didn't disappoint at all! 100+ degrees in a couple of moves -- easy! And easy not only in terms of the loads on the body and hands, but also in terms of piloting technique. But of course one should remember that the Artik R2 is not a school wing at all, and it surely won't forgive gross mistakes in wingovers. However, for those who feel justified confidence in themselves when doing wingovers, the Artik R2 will be a wonderful toy for further polishing the piloting skills they already have.
Dangerous flight regimes
Spin out of thermal spiral
Somewhat unusual, but this is an unusualness with a plus sign. A considerable part of the span gets involved in the spin, about 30 percent (usually 20-25%). But everything else -- the drop of the load on the inner hand, the feeling of slipping, the change of airspeed -- is classic, unambiguous and clear. The exit is also clear and predictable, and very quick on top of that. Liked it!
Quick descent techniques
Ears
Stability
Sink rate
Line effort
Ambiguous. On the plus side, the "ears" are big and efficient; on the minus side, there is a high load on the outer A lines. Better not to handle these lines with bare hands, you can easily saw through your skin. But once you have managed to "break" the stubborn leading edge and stabilize the regime, it goes calmly, and the sink rate is -3 m/s or more even without the speed bar.
B-ears
The same problem as with ordinary "ears" -- allowing for the small diameter of the outer rear lines. When trying to do B-ears with these lines, it is quite possible to cut even your gloves. Do it carefully!
Niviuk has made a very interesting wing! It seems to be a racer, but it has more maneuverability and feedback than the market mainstream (within reason). It doesn't seem to be a semi-light, but it weighs little, launches great in difficult conditions, and in many ways resembles lightweight wings like the Klimbers or the Artik 7P. And on top of that it flies great. It very much looks like the Artik R2 is that rare case when you get roughly everything at once. Sport class competitions? The Artik R2 seems to be made for them. Hike-and-fly? No problem! The wing is light enough, but without the problems typical of ultralights: a delicate construction, too much feedback and/or discomfort. Flying serious cross-country? Any time! It flies great, on the level of competition two-liners. Fooling around close to the slope? Easy! There is quite enough maneuverability. At the time of writing this test report, the only possible competitor to this Artik I can name, with some stretch, is the Ozone Lyght (and yes, don't ask me how to pronounce it!), but that one is a clear "lightweight" with all its minuses and peculiarities. And so I'll honestly write that the Artik R2, in my opinion, is unique in its genre. A real game changer that boldly breaks the established balance. And yes, if I wanted to get a truly versatile EN C wing for myself -- I'd take this Artik without a second thought.
And now the bonus question. The entry level... For racing wings this is a very difficult question. But the Artik R2 doesn't seem to be quite a racer. Or more than a racer?.. I'll settle on a cautious estimate of 150-200 hours. Mainly because of that very feedback and maneuverability, which give the pilot a lot, but also demand a bit more. Whether you need this or not -- it's up to you, pilots! As for me, the Artik R2 definitely "clicked".
Pros
- Excellent balance of comfort and feedback
- Pleasant maneuverability
- High overall performance
Cons
- Thin outer lines of the front and rear rows, which together with a high line load make "ears" difficult
Thanks
I would like to thank:
- Nikita Shishin for providing the wing for the tests
- Maria Grigoryeva for organizing the logistics
Copyright
- Photo: I. Tarasova, A. Tarasov
Technical data
| Flat area, sq. m. | 24 |
|---|---|
| Flat A.R. | 6,5 |
| Flat span, m | 12,49 |
| Projected area, sq. m. | 20,54 |
| Projected A.R. | 5,02 |
| Cells, total | 68 |
| Cord max, m | 2,42 |
| Lines length, m | 203 |
| Lines scheme | A2A'1B3 |
| Accelerator travel, mm | 160 |
| Takeoff weight, kg | 90-105 |
| Glider weight, kg | 4,8 |
| Size | 24 |
Materials and components
| Manufacturer | Material | |
|---|---|---|
| Upper surface, leading edge | DOMINICO | N20 DMF |
| Upper surface except leading edge | DOMINICO | N20 DMF |
| Bottom surface | DOMINICO | N10 DMF |
| Ribs, supported | DOMINICO | N30 DMF / 2044 32 FM |
| Ribs, unsupported | DOMINICO | N30 DMF / 2044 32 FM |
| Diagonal ribs | DOMINICO | N30 DMF |
| Lines, upper cascades | Liros / Edelrid | DC40 / A-8001U |
| Lines, middle cascades | Liros / Edelrid | DC / A-8001U |
| Lines, main (lower) cascades | Edelrid | A-8001U |
| Lines, brakes | Edelrid | TARAX-200 |
| Risers, webbing | Cousin | 3455 |
| Risers, pulleys | Ronstan | RF25109 |
| Thread | Serafil | 60 |










