8.03 / 10

Swing Sphera RS: in the sphere of tranquility

Can a EN D 2-liner with an AR of about 7 be relaxed and comfortable? Swing has convincingly proved: it can!

2024-09-20
OverviewSpecsConclusion

Ultralight — or high performance? Comfort — or agility? In the specific niche of EN D 2-liners, the answers to these questions seem to have been found long ago. But Swing has its own way of answering them! The Sphera doesn't recognize conventional limits, it goes beyond them. And there is nothing wrong with that!

8.25 / 10

Construction




8 / 10

Risers


Better than the Sphere's little sister, the Libra RS. The differences are seemingly small, but in flight they are critical. The handles on the rear rows are slightly larger and much more comfortable, and the rear rows themselves don't twist, allowing full handle operation. Otherwise, it's still the same modern Swing — no miracles, but not without a spark of creativity and unusualness. Narrow, neatly stitched strap, supplemented in places by a thick and very slippery Dyneema line. Branded brake handles with rigid inserts, which I personally do not like, but which can be easily removed. Kinematics without over-complication, bearing blocks are used in the most stressed areas. The acceleration system is equipped with an overdrive bead, which allows you to choose between a long speed system travel and a heavy load on your legs.

8.5 / 10

Lines


Everything is high quality and thorough, which is what you would expect from a German company. The lines on all tiers are not braided, but with high quality anti-UV impregnation, which is not always the case. The lines scheme is simple and clear: A2A'1B3. Under the canopy there is also nothing out of the ordinary...

8.25 / 10

Canopy



8 / 10

Build quality

8.5 / 10

Surface smoothness

...but some non-trivial things happen to the canopy. Or rather, inside the canopy. Yes, yes, the Sphera RS - as the name implies - has the Swing RAST inside, i.e. a full span partition across the chord. The purpose of the baffle is to impede the flow between the front and back of the chord, which Swing claims has many positive effects, such as increased resistance to collapses. There are also less positive effects, but more on that below. The wing stiffeners are interesting. They are made of nitinol, but in the front part of the chord the nitinol is covered with plastic. This is mainly to prevent the nitinol from rubbing against the fabric, but of course the plastic also affects the stiffness of the wing and its mass. And the weight of the Sphere is not insignificant — about 6 kg! Roughly two times the weight of Niviuk's weightless Klimbers. But there's a reason for this mass. The most portable elements of the Sphere are made of Skytex with a density of 38 g/m2, and where the requirements for the fabric are softer, Skytex with a density of 31 and even 28 g/m2 is used. The rigid elements cover about 80% of the chord, so it is necessary to pack the Sphere very carefully and wrap the accordion around the harness. Wing shape is, surprisingly, the same shape that Swings had 10-15 years ago, instantly recognizable. AR is standard for EN D, about 7. Sections are neither too many nor too few — there's 75 of them. The quality of the cut and stitching is unquestionable, everything is neatly done.


7.5 / 10

Takeoff and groundhandling


7.5 / 10

Takeoff


The Sphera definitely behaves like a heavy wing! It comes over your head steadily and slowly, with almost no tendency to surge forward. Very nice in moderate and strong winds, less nice in no wind or back wind. The Cobra launch is possible with at least 4-5 m/s wind. Due to RAST, the trailing edge of the chord inflates slowly and difficult, and trailing edge flutter is possible.


8.33 / 10

Flight




8 / 10

Glide


Unfortunately, I did not have a chance to fly side-by-side with other EN D gliders, but my guess is that the Sphera's overall performance is good for the EN D class.

8 / 10

Accelerated flight



8 / 10

Speed gain

8 / 10

Speed system effort

8 / 10

Speed system travel

Speed measurements with the TAS probe gave +13...+15 km/h at 50% of the speed bar, +20...+22 km/h at full speed. Not the top of the EN D class, but quite good and acceptable. In addition, due to the Sphera's comfort and stability, you can use the speed system a lot even in a rough staff.

8 / 10

Soaring and sink rate



8 / 10

Sink rate in straight flight

8 / 10

Sink rate in spiral

Normal, even, perhaps, better than average. I didn't notice any special "floatability" - but even without it Sphera confidently holds a small rate of descent in weak and medium thermals.

8.5 / 10

Turn ability



7.5 / 10

Brakes efficiency

9 / 10

Weight shift efficiency

9 / 10

Rear risers control

The brake response is not too sharp, but rather smooth, just what you need to work with any kind of thermal. When loaded below the middle of the certified weight range, the Sphera requires a lot of brake input to turn well, and the typical brake load is high in this case. After a few hours in the air, your arms may get tired. It's much better near the top of the certified weight range. The Sphera becomes more reactive, you need less brake input and less effort. I really liked the turning ability in this case. And regardless of the load, the Sphera is very responsive to weight changes! Better than typical for EN D wings.

The rear risers are Niviuk style: moderately loaded at trim speed, they become very light but still efficient when accelerating. At full speed you can control the Sphera with your fingertips on the rear handles. I personally like this!

9.5 / 10

Comfort and feedback



10 / 10

Comfort

9 / 10

Feedback

The quietest and most peaceful EN D 2-liner I have ever flown! Sphera is incredibly pitch stable. Trying to create some pitch movement with "dolphins", I got no more than 20 degrees of pitch. Applying more brake results in almost nothing, the Sphera stands calmly above the pilot's head. The real pitches in moderately turbulent conditions are of similar amplitude, rarely reaching 30 degrees. The Sphera is also quite stable in yaw. Centering the thermals is easy and comfortable, with minimal parasitic movements. As for snakes and wobbles, they do exist, but it's really difficult to get them. Despite the AR of 7, the wing behaves like a monoblock! Quite a rare feeling in the EN D class. Load changes on brakes and main lines are smooth and gradual, the wing doesn't "slap" its pilot. Perfect!

Feedback. The Sigma 10 feeling! This Sphera "speaks" a very nice "language", discreet but explicit and easy to understand. But there's also a lot of "2-liner magic". Far from the lift, the Sphera tends to drift towards the core, giving clear and direct signals to the pilot. Closer to the core, it even tries to "auto-center"! Yes, this glider will not be thrown out of the core, it will try to jump in! The feedback from load changes on the brakes and harness is well present, well dosed, classic.

8 / 10

Dynamics and energy retention



8 / 10

Dynamics

8 / 10

Energy retention

Calm power. That's how you can characterize the Sphera when it comes to dynamics and power capacity. Not too much, not too little — exactly what you expect from an EN D 2-liner!


It's amazing how different Swing has made two very similar looking wings — Libra RS and Sphera RS. Both have an aspect ratio of about 7, a similar shape in plan.... But the character of these wings is radically different. If the Libra is, let's say, hot by the standards of its class, the Sphera turns out to be unrealistically quiet and comfortable. For long flights in difficult conditions, it's just right! So the Sphera is a kind of mountain wing for X-Alps and other hike-and-fly? Well, not exactly. It's heavy, over 5 kilos. And it's a little tricky to launch. But once the pilot is in the air — no problem! The Sphera doesn't claim to be the performance leader in the EN D class — but it does offer an unprecedented combination of performance and comfort!

And yet — who would be interested in such a wing and why? Mountain pilots — if they are not planning on long walks and short, difficult launches in zero or crosswind conditions. Flatland pilots — if they want the maximum comfort possible in the EN D class, even at the cost of a small loss of performance. The Sphera is also a great crossover glider for those who fly both flat and mountain, but do not want to spend money on two sets of equipment for such different flights. And, of course, the Sphera is a more than worthy choice for those who want to familiarize themselves with the EN D class in a comfortable and safe way.

I estimate the minimum required flying time to be around 150 hours. EN D after all. And the aspect ratio is higher than 7, but you don't often think about that in flight because the Sphera is so comfortable.

Pros

  • Very high comfort
  • Pleasant character
  • Accelerator that can be used even in rough conditions

Peculiarities

  • Slowly gets into the flight position

Thanks

Thanks to Kalle and Peter for providing the wing for the tests.

Copyright

  • Foto: A.Tarasov, Swing

Model

Year2022
BrandSwing
HomologationEN D
PositioningEN D 2-liner

Conditions

Flight sitesUshkonyr
HarnessesSky Paragliders Skylighter 4
Total flight weight100 kg

Technical data

Flat area, sq. m.24,2
Flat A.R.6,9
Flat span, m12,87
Projected area, sq. m.20,8
Projected A.R.5,2
Projected span, m10,4
Cells, total75
Lines schemeA2A'1B3
Takeoff weight, kg95-110
Glider weight, kg5,9
SizeML

Materials and components

Upper surface, leading edgePorcherSkytex 38
Upper surface except leading edgePorcherSkytex 31
Bottom surfacePorcherSkytex 28
Ribs, supportedPorcherSkytex 32
Lines, upper cascadesLirosDC40
Lines, middle cascadesLirosDC100
Lines, main (lower) cascadesEdelrid8001U
Risers, webbingCousin12mm
OverviewSpecsConclusion